Skip to content

Conversation

@mzuenni
Copy link
Collaborator

@mzuenni mzuenni commented Oct 20, 2025

@mzuenni mzuenni marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 20:52
Copy link
Owner

@RagnarGrootKoerkamp RagnarGrootKoerkamp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See tiny fixes & suggestion in last commit.

@mzuenni mzuenni merged commit f7a9269 into main Oct 29, 2025
6 checks passed
@mzuenni mzuenni deleted the more-typing branch October 29, 2025 17:42
mpsijm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpsijm mpsijm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finally took the time to quickly check the changes, @mzuenni thank you so much for the big cleanup and making sure we can finaly use mypy --strict 🤩

Only two things stood out to me when scrolling through the diff. The first I fixed in 94a14ef, and the second one is the comment below:

Comment on lines +10 to +12
# organize imports in two blocks, non local and local
section-order = ["standard-library", "first-party"]
default-section = "standard-library"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mzuenni Do you have a strong opinion against the default ordering (["standard-library", "third-party", "first-party"])? I think I would prefer the default ordering and remove these two settings 🙂

(of course, we shouldn't do this while #474 is open, but I'll keep it on my list 😄)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No opinion here / I am fine with whatever. This was just the setting closest to how we already formatted the includes manually

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All right! Then I'll change the settings to default when #474 no longer blocks this. The diff should not be too big, and it's automated anyway 😄

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

feel free to just do it, I think I will just write a regex for the rebase anyways

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants